Climate Change – A Titanic Problem For All Earthlings

 

 

by Sandra Kyle, Editor, May Safely Graze

 

Our response to climate disaster has been compared to rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic.  It’s an apt analogy.   For far too long the world, convinced our Mothership is ‘unsinkable’, has refused to take climate change seriously.   Instead of clear, decisive, early action we are inclined to small, futile gestures.  If we continue along these lines it could, in the words of leading NZ Climate Scientist Professor James Renwick, “upend our communities and our societies at almost incalculable cost”.

Warnings that burning so many fossil fuels would change the Earth’s climate were first sounded by scientists as far back as the 1960s, based on science understood since the turn of the 20th century.   In the intervening decades, especially in the last thirty years, we have seen predictions of more extreme weather events realised at an increasing rate.  Yet wealthy nations are still behaving like entitled first-class passengers on the Titanic.  Unwilling to make changes to our privileged lives, we have given no thought at all to the plight of third world nations – the ‘steerage classes’ – whose contribution to global warming is significantly less than our own, but who inevitably end up paying the heaviest price.

Unwilling to make changes to our privileged lives, we have given no thought at all to the plight of third world nations – the ‘steerage classes’ – whose contribution to global warming is significantly less than our own, but who inevitably end up paying the heaviest price.

For the last quarter of a century that yearly COPs, or ‘Conference of Parties’ have taken place, the world has seen record heatwaves, sea ice and glacier melts, sea level rise, severe droughts, out-of-control wildfires, devastating floods, intense storms and other catastrophes.  These events have caused the deaths of tens of thousands of people, with millions of the most vulnerable in developing countries losing homes, livelihood and food security.   They have also condemned thousands of domestic animals and millions of wild animals to cruel deaths by fire, drowning, starvation and habitat loss.

Ahead of COP27, currently being held in Egypt, the June Bonn Climate Change Conference shared data showing that addressing animal agriculture is key to combating climate change and meeting the targets set out in the Paris Agreement.    At this summit the Humane Society International hosted a side event focussing on how plant-based protein can significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

Agricultural emissions are very significant globally, and especially here in New Zealand.  It follows that the agricultural sector is a major lever to combat the worst effects of climate change, but while a lot of attention has been given to the transport and energy sectors, in previous COPs food has only been addressed tangentially.  I was pleased to note that in COP27, food system transformation, along with help for poorer nations most affected by climate change, has finally made it to the Agenda.

Last month our government released the farmgate emissions pricing scheme. Greenpeace lead climate campaigner Christine Rose calls it ‘greenwash’, as it  fails to address the problem of our enormous agricultural emissions, favours intensive dairy, and doesn’t  properly regulate, price and cut methane emissions.

Last month our government released the farmgate emissions pricing scheme. Greenpeace lead climate campaigner Christine Rose calls it ‘greenwash’, as it fails to address the problem of our enormous agricultural emissions, favours intensive dairy, and doesn’t  properly regulate, price, and cut methane emissions.

As part of their measures to address the problem caused by animal agriculture, the Government has recently established the Centre for Climate Action on Agricultural Emissions.  This is bound to be another waste of money and precious time – time we may not have.  For example, for more than two decades there has been ongoing research on alternative feeds that lower the amount of methane released from livestock farts and burps, and a breakthrough still hasn’t been achieved.  Instead of remedial measures, what is needed is for our government to go to the heart of the problem – – animal agriculture is inefficient and unsustainable – and begin to transition our farmers to climate-friendly crop growing and horticulture.

Our Earth is in deep trouble, and who is to say when we reach the point of no return?  It is time for our government to think food transformation, not tax levies.  Climate change doesn’t only affect humans, it affects all life on earth.  It’s not just our Mothership we’re destroying.  It’s theirs too.

‘We Should Stop Using Euphemisms For Animal Exploitation And Abuse’

 

by Sandra Kyle, Editor, May Safely Graze

 

When non vegans say things like ‘But plants have feelings too’ they are generally being disingenuous.  If someone says it to me I usually answer along the lines of:

‘Would you prefer to take your child strawberry picking or to a slaughterhouse?’

or

“If a dog runs out in front of your car, would you swerve into a bed of roses, or save the roses and run over the dog?’

Disingenuousness aside, it is entirely possible that in the future we may learn that plants do experience pain using different mechanisms.   But at our present level of understanding, and as they have no nervous system or pain detectors,  we are justified in stating that plants do not feel pain, and our common sense tells us that equating animal and plant sentience is not a credible position.

Humans and non-human animals share a long, common evolution, and anyone who keeps animal companions know that they are more similar to us than dissimilar.     Dogs even have prostates I was told yesterday by a vet.  When I look into my dogs’ eyes I can recognise myself.  When I look at a cauliflower –  not so much!

 

“Dogs even have prostates I was told yesterday by a vet.  When I look into my dogs’ eyes I can recognise myself.  When I look at a cauliflower –  not so much!”

 

Animals are our kin,  our planetary comrades. Despite being different species, they share our ability to feel, and they value their lives just as much as we value ours.

If your child were to visit a slaughterhouse it is unlikely that they would escape without trauma by witnessing the gruesome violence that goes on there.  Most adults too would be wounded to witness innocent, terrified animals being stunned, gassed, knifed, decapitated and dismembered.  It is a horrible business, and little wonder that the terms used in these places sugarcoat the reality. Even the word ‘slaughterhouse’ is not used by the Industry.   In some parts of the world they are called ‘factories’.  Here in New Zealand they are called ‘meatworks’.

We use euphemisms in our relationship with other humans to substitute for the stark reality that most of us find disturbing to think about.  Going after wild animals with a shotgun or spear is known as ‘harvesting’.  Destroying farmed animals’ lives when it is deemed the most ‘effective’ response, is known as ‘depopulation’.     The act of slaughtering billions of farmed animals every year, often when they are still little more than babies, needs to be sanitised to mitigate the horror, and to make us feel better about eating them.  For example ‘C02 stunning’ may sound as if the animal goes gently to sleep, but it is a cruel method that causes pigs to gasp for breath and hyperventilate, causing both pain and panic for up to sixty seconds.  Similarly, ‘thumping’ is the term used to kill piglets (and also baby goats) by swinging them around and pounding their heads against concrete.

 

“The act of ending the lives of innocent animals, often when they are still little more than babies, needs to be sanitised to mitigate the horror, and to make us feel better about eating them.”

 

We should stop using euphemisms to describe the horror of animal slaughter, and tell it as it is.

That way we may wake up to the suffering we cause every time we eat dairy products, or eat a meal of meat.

 

 

SOME SLAUGHTERHOUSE TERMS

Antemortem inspection:  The examination of live animals prior to slaughter to check for disease.

Blood Pit:  The area of a slaughterhouse where animals are bled out.

Bloodsplash: The rupture of capillaries in muscle tissue during electrical stunning which causes unsightly blood spots in the meat.  Bloodsplash hemorrhages are problematic from an aesthetic viewpoint, and cause a reduction in meat value.

Bung:  A slaughtered animal’s anus.

Captive bolt gun:  A gun, powered by compressed air or gunpowder, that drives a bolt into an animal’s forehead to render the animal unconscious.

Carcass: The skeleton and musculature of an animal, minus after decapitation and removal of the legs.

Chain: The overhead conveyor that carries shackled animals from worker to worker through the slaughter and dressing processes.

Chain speed: How fast the chain is moving, measured in number of animals per unit of time. (Aka Line speed)

Chitlins: The intenstines of hogs (pigs) used in prepared foods.

Chutes: Enclosed passageways that lead animals from their pens to the stun area.

CO2 stunning (carbon dioxide anaesthesia):  A method used to render an animal unconscious for slaughter.

Downer:  A sick, spent, or disabled animal who cannot stand or walk.

Dressing:  Removal of the hide, appendages and viscera.

Gutter:  A worker who takes the guts out of slaughtered animals.

Hot shot: An electric cattle prod.

Kill floor: Where animals have their necks or chests sliced.

Legger: The worker who cuts off and skins an animal’s legs.

PACing  (also called ‘thumping’):  Method of killing piglets whereby the piglet is picked up by the hind legs and slammed against the floor.  This causes massive head trauma, resulting in death (not always instantaneous).

Render: The process whereby animal parts are cooked down, to separate fat from protein, and then sold for use in animal feed, fertilizer, oils, plastics, cosmetics and a host of other household and industrial products.

Ritual slaughter:   Religious slaughter done according to the requirements of either the Muslim or Jewish religious faith. The animal is slaughtered, often without being stunned, with a razor sharp knife.

Scalding tank:  A long narrow tank containing 140 degree water through which pigs are dragged to loosen hair for dehairing.

Shackler: A worker who places a chain around an animal’s hind leg so that it can be hoisted and hung on the overhead rail.

Stunner: The worker who stuns the animals before they are shackled and hoisted.

Sticker: The slaughterhouse worker who cuts the animal’s throat open to bleed it.

 

 

Rodeo Violence Could Damage New Zealand’s Overseas Trade – Lynn Charlton, Anti-Rodeo Action NZ

Thousands of rodeos take place in the world every year, around 35 in New Zealand. Originally arising out of cattle herding practices in Mexico and Spain, today they are held as mass entertainment, and to test the skill and speed of ‘cowboys and cowgirls’.   

Most rodeo activities cause the animals they use pain and distress,  Physical injuries include broken necks, broken bones, bruising, and ruptured skin.  The animals – sometimes just babies as in ‘calf roping’ –  also suffer extreme psychological stress.

In this article, Lynn Charlton of Anti-Rodeo Action argues that the violence we continue to allow against defenceless animals is at odds with our own Animal Welfare Act.  Rodeo contradicts New Zealand’s self-proclaimed high animal welfare, and could damage our overseas trade.

(First published as an Opinion Editorial in stuff.co.nz. 

Feature image: Lynn Charlton of Anti-Rodeo Action NZ.)

 

Photo credit: Bejon Haswell/Stuff 

 

Last week, Agriculture Minister Damien O’Connor warned that international markets have indicated that New Zealand farming practices are going to come under increasing scrutiny, so “we all have to lift our game”.

“We live in a fishbowl whether we like it or not,” O’Connor said.

In 2017, the minister warned: “Disruption is upon us. If we don’t have better environmental management, if we don’t have more sustainable land use and uphold the highest standards of animal welfare, we won’t be able to sell our products into … high-value markets.”

READ MORE:
Government backs down on promise to ban elements of rodeo
Action group appeals to UN to have children banned from rodeo
Rodeo: Ultimate sport, family fun or blatant animal abuse?

Despite these warnings, resistance to doing the right thing is rife in New Zealand, as the farming community, fearful of change, demonstrates so well.

One area of resistance from farmers is in the violence committed against animals at rodeos.

The New Zealand Animal Law Association concluded, in 2018, that rodeos are illegal and in breach of the Animal Welfare Act.

That same year, the National Animal Welfare Advisory Committee (NAWAC) convened an expert animal welfare panel which, applying science (though most people could see that it was cruel), found that animals experienced moderate to severe impacts in every rodeo event bar one – and that one isn’t without its problems. With the rodeo travelling-cruelty-circuses resuming this coming weekend, the assault-as-entertainment will be perpetuated by the same farmers that profit from exports based on our supposedly high animal welfare standards.

Retired beef, sheep, dairy farmer and anti-rodeo campaigner Alice Hicks, one of the few farmers willing to speak out publicly against rodeos, was asked to comment for this article. She said, “If farmers treated animals in their day-to-day business the way rodeos treat animals, they would be prosecuted, and have frightened, non-productive animals”.

Soon it will be five years since legal and animal welfare experts produced their findings.

The country has watched animals being brutalised every summer since, slowed only by Covid-19. This year legal action in the High Court to stop rodeos was passed back to NAWAC, when Justice Churchman acknowledged he did not have the expertise to assess each rodeo event. Fair enough.

In a radical change for NAWAC – and one decades overdue – a recent stakeholder document on a proposed new rodeo code of welfare includes banning calf roping, calf riding, steer wrestling, team roping, breakaway roping and spurring.

We await the next phase of public consultation on this, and no doubt the farming lobby, profiting from exports, will be claiming rodeos have great animal welfare, and being thrown around and spurred in the neck doesn’t hurt animals one bit. From their point of view, if animals can walk away after the assault, it didn’t hurt them. Loathe to say it, but that mentality was once commonly used against women who had suffered assault.

“We await the next phase of public consultation on this, and no doubt the farming lobby, profiting from exports, will be claiming rodeos have great animal welfare, and being thrown around and spurred in the neck doesn’t hurt animals one bit.”

The problem is that farmers and their lobby groups have too much say in government, and every government, is and has been, lassoed, washing-lined, and hog-tied into submission by them. Farmers are rodeo. Without them, rodeos would not exist.

Meanwhile, clubs have been recruiting children and young people and practising away from public scrutiny. Following rodeo association guidelines, they’ve avoided posting videos and photographs because of public outcry. This Government and any other government will be failing to uphold the rule of law by allowing rodeos to continue, confirming to farmers that violence towards animals is state-sanctioned.

While it shouldn’t take concerns over profit from export to inspire us to do the right thing by animals, we’ve been warned, and will get what we deserve.

Discerning international markets are watching and will increasingly be watching how we manage the environment and animal welfare.

The Government must do the right thing, and those farmers who are genuinely concerned about animal welfare should speak out and call for a ban on this violence.

“The Government must do the right thing, and those farmers who are genuinely concerned about animal welfare should speak out and call for a ban on this violence.”

Animal Activists Sway A Jury By Their Mercy

 

 

by Sandra Kyle, Editor, May Safely Graze

 

This week a jury found two animal rights activists not guilty on burglary and theft charges, setting a “powerful precedent” for the right to rescue animals.

In 2017 Wayne Hsiung and Paul Darwin Picklesimer entered a pig farm in Utah to take footage, and came out with two sick piglets.  If they had been found guilty, they faced imprisonment for up to five years each.

Hsiung, an attorney who represented himself, told the jury: “I want you to acquit us as a matter of conscience. There’s a big difference between stealing and rescue.”

The farm they entered was owned by Smithfield Foods, which raises and slaughters millions of innocent beings every year.  Pigs are sensitive and cognitively complex, yet they live lives of misery and are slaughtered in horrific ways because of the demand for their flesh.

Smithfield Foods is a ‘hog’ producer based out of Smithfield, Virginia, where millions of pigs are slaughtered every year.  As is common in companies who exploit animals, they advertise themselves as raising ‘responsible, sustainable’ products, an outrageous statement that couldn’t be further from the truth.  The Humane Society of the United States investigation into the company in 2010 revealed shocking cases of cruelty, including pigs being beaten.  In 2021 HSUS sued the company for continuing to mislead consumers about how they raise their pigs.

“They advertise themselves as raising ‘responsible, sustainable’ products, an outrageous statement that couldn’t be further from the truth”.

The Smithfield Packaging Company was started in the 1930s by Joseph W. Luter and his son Joseph W. Luter Jr.  At the outset of their endeavour they would buy 15 pig carcasses per day and sell the chopped up pieces to local businesses.   Their first processing plant was opened in 1946, where they slaughtered 3,500 hogs per day. Ten years later, their company had grown to 650 employees.

Smithfield Foods remained in the Luter family as a major player in the meat industry for decades, until in 2013 they were bought by the WH Group of China, formerly known as the Shuanghui Group.

Pork is the most popular meat in China, and as the middle class expands, the demand for pig meat has skyrocketed in that country.  To meet the demand, and save on land space, piggeries are now converting to high rises.

Chinese love pork, Americans can’t do without their bacon.  And because of this, billions of intelligent and aware sentient beings are condemned to a life of suffering, painful stunning by gassing,  and a violent death.

Smithfields show their pigs no mercy.  The verdict this week is a tribute to two activists who swayed a jury by theirs.

Will the Dr Oz animal abuse controversy help to end animal testing?

 

 

by Sandra Kyle, Editor, May Safely Graze

 

I remember watching Dr Mehmet Oz on The Oprah Winfrey Show, where he made many appearances over the years.  Oprah was clearly a fan, and Harpo Productions subsequently launched The Dr Oz Show, a daily television program on medical matters and health that was hosted by the charismatic heart surgeon.  The program, while popular, came under a lot of scrutiny by the medical establishment as he featured such topics as faith healing and the paranormal.  Now the doctor is embroiled in even more serious allegations, that he abused animals when he was ‘principal investigator’ in the Columbia University Institute of Comparative Medicine labs.

Mehmet Oz is a true American success story.  The son of Turkish immigrants whose father literally grew up ‘dirt poor’ – sleeping on a dirt floor in his native country – before emigrating to the United States.   Before he became a medical celebrity he had a brilliant career as a heart surgeon and academic, and in the latest stage of his self -reinvention is venturing into politics, currently running for the Pennsylvania Senate.   From his point of view, the news that surfaced this week that he supervised a vivisection laboratory that committed animal abuse is terrible timing.

After centuries of vivisection going back to 500 BCE, and that swelled enormously from the mid 20th century, we seem to be reaching a point where testing on animals is losing public sanction.  Yet an estimated 100 million animals still suffer and die every year in laboratories all over the world, with little or no protection from cruelty.  While a wide range of animals are experimented on, most commonly used are non-human primates, rats and mice, dogs, pigs, cats, sheep, rabbits and pigeons.  The animals are then killed when they are no longer useful to the experiment.

It is cruel and unethical to sentence animals to a barren life in a laboratory cage, intentionally cause them pain, disfiguration, loneliness, fear and despair, and then at the end of it all, take their lives.  But it is also bad science.

In 2004 the FDA estimated that 92 percent of drugs that pass preclinical tests, and use animals, fail to proceed to the market.  One has to ask how all that time, money, energy – and animal suffering – can be justified for such a poor result.

 

 

Humane alternatives to animal testing now exist, including computer modelling, in vitro technology, human-patient simulators among others, and what’s more they are cheaper, faster and more accurate than animal tests.

It is time to stop the cruelty and waste that is animal testing, and use current technology to achieve better outcomes.

New Zealand Anti-Vivisection Website

 

Tell us why you think there will be a vegan world before the end of the decade

For years May Safely Graze (previously End Animal Slaughter) have been predicting a vegan world, with 2025 as a watershed year in western nations.

We are interested to know what you think.   Will we have a vegan world before the end of the decade?   Fill out the form and let us know! 

 

 

Contact form

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Will Finland be the first country to go vegan?

  • When Finnish company Meeat Food Tech changed from traditional meat to plant-based they turned a profit for the first time in a decade.
  • “Combining the ongoing climate crisis with the abysmal feed yield and calorie conversion rates for animal proteins, it makes no sense to continue on that path,” CEO Mikko Karell says.
  • Accelerating the transformation to a purely plant-based food system globally depends on what happens in the large countries where living standards are improving, particularly China and India.
  • Finland’s meat consumption is less than the US or Australia, but is among the world’s top dairy consumers per capita.

Continue reading

Confessions of a ‘Bug Girl’ – VEGAN VOICES writer Claudia Lifton

Next in our series on the writers of “VEGAN VOICES –  Essays by Inspiring Changemakers”, is Claudia Lifton.

Claudia has been with the Factory Farming Awareness Coalition since 2015. Prior to working with FFAC, she travelled throughout Africa and Southeast Asia, working with locals to address concerns ranging from poaching, shark finning, overfishing, water access, animal tourism exploitation, to wildlife trafficking. She spent three summers working at Catskill Animal Sanctuary in New York, helping to run Camp Kindness, a summer camp where children learned about farmed animals, plant-based diet and nutrition, and effective advocacy. In her free time, Claudia enjoys attending concerts and festivals, hiking, camping, and cuddling with rescued farmed animals at her favourite sanctuaries.

Extract from her essay in VEGAN VOICES:

“ It started with earthworms. While other kids played with Barbie dolls and Tonka trucks, I played with annelids and insects. I quickly became Highmount Avenue’s resident animal rescuer. Neighbours would call my mom if they found injured butterflies, baby birds, or snakes. As my rescue services became better known, we had to convert our downstairs bathroom into a makeshift rehabilitation center, filled with creatures in need of a helping hand. The derogatory nickname I was given by my classmates in elementary school (which I later reclaimed as a badge of honor) was “Bug Girl….

.. “I’ve come a long way from “Bug Girl.” I still love all creatures, big and small, but I’ve moved on from spending my days playing with earthworms and spiders to advocating for cows and pigs, from preaching to my fellow nine-year-olds about the cruelty of killing ants to standing in front of thousands of students a year, entreating them to stop harming chickens and turkeys. I’ve moved on from battling my teachers when they’d try to make us dissect frogs in the classroom to battling one of the most powerful industries on Earth, determined to intimidate me and my fellow activists into silence. I know that together, we will never stop fighting until every cage is empty.”

 

Review of Vegan Voices by Bruce Friedrich, Co-founder & Executive Director, The Good Food Institute:

“There are as many reasons to be vegan as there are vegans, as this lovely anthology makes clear. So many of my heroes in one place—what a treat. Read it and be inspired.”

 

Vegan Voices: Essays by Inspiring Changemakers
Available at Lantern Publishing & Media
Paperback ISBN: 978-1-59056-650-3
eBook ISBN: 978-1-59056-651-0

How I Became A Voice For The Animals – VEGAN VOICES writer Shweta Borgaonkar

Next in our series on the writers of “VEGAN VOICES –  Essays by Inspiring Changemakers”, is Shweta Borgaonkar.  

Shweta is an animal rights activist from Pune, India. At the time of this essay, she is twenty years old, and her mission in life is to create a world where all animals are respected and treated as individuals. She started out volunteering at adoption camps for stray cat sand dogs and joined a vegan activism group at the age of sixteen.  She co-organized Pune’s first Animal Libertion March in 2018 and the Pan-India Animal Liberation March in 2019. Shweta has also led training sessions to help activists become better organizers.  She co-organized the Pune chapters of Direct Action Everywhere (DxE) and the Animal Save Movement. Currently, she is doing undergraduate work in the field of commerce and is an aspiring law student.  

 

Extract from her essay in VEGAN VOICES:

“I grew up in a city with not many animals around.  Growing up with a lack of interaction with animals, I was scared of them. This changed when Girija, a street dog, came into my life. In the beginning, I used to be so scared of her that I would walk on the edge of the road to avoid being in close proximity to her. But slowly, with her beautiful black eyes and wagging tail, she made my fear go away and became my best friend. This was the first time I had connected with a nonhuman animal so deeply. Something inside of me loved her unconditionally and she loved me back unconditionally.

One day, I went to class and everyone told me that Girija was no more. She had been hit and killed by a vehicle. I was devastated. I somehow controlled my tears in class… but I knew she didn’t deserve to die like this. She deserved a safe home with a loving family.  She deserved to live in a world where everyone respected her, where she had access to medical care and food, and where her life was valued. As Girija left my life, she left me with a purpose in life – to create that world for her fellow Earthlings”. 

 

Review of Vegan Voices by Bruce Friedrich, Co-founder & Executive Director, The Good Food Institute:

“There are as many reasons to be vegan as there are vegans, as this lovely anthology makes clear. So many of my heroes in one place—what a treat. Read it and be inspired.”

 

Vegan Voices: Essays by Inspiring Changemakers
Available at Lantern Publishing & Media

Paperback ISBN: 978-1-59056-650-3
eBook ISBN: 978-1-59056-651-0

On A Mission To Improve The Lives Of Caged Birds – Helen Seta

Animal Activist Helen Seta is on a mission.  She wants to improve the life of caged birds.

Helen and a cockatoo friend

 

Helen has created an online store to provide safe and natural toys that stimulate and provide environmental enrichment to caged birds.

Whatever we may feel about keeping birds in cages, they are bred for this, and the alternative is releasing them to almost certain death in the wild.   Birds are tremendously intelligent, and our caged companions benefit from our efforts to provide them with a stimulating environment. 

Helen’s goals are:

 

– To educate and share information on bird care and welfare 

– To create change in bird care standards and regulations

– To help/rescue pet birds in neglectful and/or abusive situations

– To provide a loving home, as natural as possible, to birds in need

 

The issue of caged birds is also dear to my heart.  Birds live in severely confined spaces in millions of homes all over the world, many never even getting outside their cages.   They have minimal interaction with their humans, and become lonely, depressed, and aggressive because of their deprivations.  But even well-loved companions who are regularly out of their cages and have plenty of interaction can benefit from enrichment toys.   Through her online store Helen provides lovingly handmade toys that are made from safe and natural materials, to keep our companion birds engrossed.

Activity mats and other toys – just the ticket for bored birds

 

Do you care about the welfare of birds?  Do you have companion birds or know people that do?  Then check our Helen’s toys from littlebeaks.store, and follow her on social media:- 

https://www.instagram.com/littlebeaks/ 

https://www.facebook.com/LittleBeaks 

 

You’ll also get to know about the exploits of her three parrotlets – Viktor, Blue and Sparky!

Helen also fosters birds.  Here she is with some Rainbow Lorikeet friends

 

The plight of caged birds is often ignored by animal organisations, and Helen’s tireless work to improve their lives is important.   By supporting her,  we can give our companion birds a better life.

 

-Sandra Kyle, editor, End Animal Slaughter

 

See also:  Kiwi’s New Life Bird Rescue

 

 

 

 

There Is No Other – VEGAN VOICES writer Rae Sikora

Next in our series on the writers of “VEGAN VOICES –  Essays by Inspiring Changemakers”, is Rae Sikora.  

Rae has been a spokesperson for other species and the environment for over forty years. Her interactive critical-thinking trainings and talks have been presented around the globe. Rae is the co-founder of The Institute for Humane Education, VegFund, Santa Fe Vegan, and Plant Peace Daily. She and her partner Jim “JC” Corcoran cofounded Root 66 Vegan Cafe and Catering. They live in Santa Fe, New Mexico, with their pack of rescue dogs. 

 

Extract from her essay in VEGAN VOICES:

“We do not share other animals’ cultures and languages.  As with other humans, unless we spend a lot of time with an individual of any other species, it is easy to see them as simply a member of their group.  I have seen people who met a pig or a cow or a chicken for the first time have that experience completely change their idea about that group.  Beyond rescuing nonhuman individuals and giving them a good life, this is one of the great benefits of animal sanctuaries. Most people are forever changed when they connect with farmed animals, monkeys, chimpanzees, elephants, and others at a sanctuary. 

Most people are forever changed when they connect with farmed animals, monkeys, chimpanzees, elephants, and others at a sanctuary.   

“Who is included in our circle of caring and compassion is often determined by whether they are familiar to us and whether we have connected with them in some way.  If we let go of fear and take the time to connect with other living beings, even the most unfamiliar, we would never see their groups in the same way again.”

 

Review of Vegan Voices by Bruce Friedrich, Co-founder & Executive Director, The Good Food Institute:

“There are as many reasons to be vegan as there are vegans, as this lovely anthology makes clear. So many of my heroes in one place—what a treat. Read it and be inspired.”

 

Vegan Voices: Essays by Inspiring Changemakers
Available at Lantern Publishing & Media

Paperback ISBN: 978-1-59056-650-3
eBook ISBN: 978-1-59056-651-0

Winners of Wildlife Photography of the Year, 2021

The Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition, founded in 1965, is an annual international showcase of the best nature photography. In 2021 the contest attracted more than 50,000 entries from 95 countries. 

 

Wildlife Photographer of the Year is developed and produced by the Natural History Museum, London. 

 

View the twelve 2021 winning entries in this Atlantic article:

 

View winners from previous years on the Natural History Museum website here: